Abstract:
Iconic representations of national history tend to be used and reused
over the course of many generations of political life: part of their
affective power relates to their own ingrained, dusty historicity
(the potency of the Gettysburg Address relates as much to its continual
redeployment over a century and a half of political life as to its
initial rhetorical effectiveness). Yet when a representation of
the past is reused to many different ends, it can accumulate traces
of many and even ironically incompatible significances.
In this talk I examine visual representations of the
Russian national past and their reuse in historical painting (Ilya
Repin), opera (Rimsky-Korsakov, Shaliapin), and film (Sergei Eisenstein)
over the course of six and a half decades of rapid political change
(1880-1945) in order to study this dynamic of affective and significatory
superinscription.
|